When South African government officials and a delegation from Safari Club International (SCI) organize a conference that is by invitation only and excludes NGOs and the media, one can be excused for being somewhat suspicious. SCI is probably the most powerful hunting organization in the world and they are clearly displeased at the bad press that the trophy hunting community has been getting in the wake of the film Blood Lions, the killing of Cecil the lion and the recent trophy shooting of a venerable old tusker. Could this be the set up of a major pro-hunting pro-trade lobby heading into the CITES conference in Johannesburg next year? Quite probably as Don Pinnock reports for The Conservation Action Trust …
The South African government and US hunters – plotting the future for South Africa‘s wildlife
BY DON PINNOCK | THE CONSERVATION ACTION TRUST | 10 NOVEMBER 2015
American hunters and SA’s Department of Environmental Affairs(DEA) are meeting behind closed doors at a resort near Polokwane today to plan the future use of SA’s wildlife. The four-day conference of The African Wildlife Consultative Forum, is being run jointly byDEA and SCl, America’s biggest and most influential hunting fraternity.
From the agenda,African Wildlife Consultative Forum – 8 -12 Nov 2015 the gathering is clearly aimed at building an African pro-hunting lobby at theforthcoming meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) scheduled for Johannesburg next year.
There seems to be doubt, if not quiet deception, about who exactly is invited to the conference. The African Wildlife Consultative Forum is an offshoot of Safari Club International. But NGOs requesting access were emailed by DEA deputy director Mpho Tjiane saying “this is a Government meeting and is not open to the general public.”
“It is of grave concern that issues of this nature and importance are discussed at closed meetings with what appears to be predominantly pro-hunting representation.” Karen Trendler, Working Wild.
Journalists requesting accreditation have been told that attendance is by invitation only and they’re not invited. There is no indication that deliberations will be made public. “It is of grave concern that issues of this nature and importance are discussed at closed meetings with what appears to be predominantly pro-hunting representation,” said Karen Trendler of the NGO Working Wild. “Many conservation and response organisations will be affected by the various issues being discussed, as will broader South Africa, and it would be preferable to have wider representation.”
Ian Michler, who produced the film Blood Lions, questioned why a foreign a hunting club was playing such a significant role in deliberations about the sustainability of wildlife in Africa. ‘The agenda is clearly not only pro-hunting, but also seeks to raise doubts about the value of photo-tourism against hunting. It also appears to support those wishing to overturn the CITES ban on trade in rhino horn.
“Given the non-transparent nature of the conference, it’s hard not to infer a conspiracy between hunters and governments in proposals that will be presented to CITES in the public’s name.”
The first session kicked off with an address by professional hunting associations and presentations include issues around the trade of ivory and rhino horn, the role of sport hunting, the Vietnamese demand for rhino horn, import/export permits, the breeding of colour morphs for hunting and the value of hunting as opposed to photo-tourism.
“Given the non-transparent nature of the conference, it’s hard not to infer a conspiracy between hunters and governments in proposals that will be presented to CITES in the public’s name.” Ian Michler, Blood Lions
DEA moderators are being assisted in every session by George Pangeti, an official of Safari Club International who was head of administration in the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Management in Zimbabwe . His online biography makes it clear that the African Wildlife Consultative Forum was created by Safari Club International to “discuss issues of sustainable wildlife management, sport hunting and benefit flow’ in Africa.
It was also tasked to lobby CITES ‘in support of sustainable use, especially sport hunting, and trade in wildlife products.” Following the recent death of Cecil the lion and a huge tusker in Zimbabwe,One Of Africa’s Biggest Elephants Was Just Killed By Trophy Hunters, trophy hunting has come under considerable pressure from governments and conservation organisations.
Questions have been raised about whether trophy hunters are protectors of biodiversity, as they claim, providing funds and a reason to protect wild areas, or whether they are simply killers of wild animals? SCI has a large and wealthy membership keen to counter negative publicity about trophy hunting.
The agenda at the Polokwane meeting makes it clear that they aim to convince African delegates to support trophy hunting and act as a bulwark against growing distaste among members of CITES.
SCI has a large and wealthy membership keen to counter negative publicity about trophy hunting.
The South African Governments enthusiastic support for this line of thinking, despite scientific studies, Big game hunting in West Africa, What is its contribution to conservation? which show that little money from hunting goes to communities and that killing the biggest and fittest animals, Why Killing a Bull Elephant With Big Tusks Hurts the Herd is detrimental to species, is of concern to many involved in genuine conservation.
This article was produced with the support of The Conservation Action Trust.